Gagosian Quarterly

July 31, 2015


Terrie Sultan, Director of the Parrish Art Museum, discusses Andreas Gursky: Landscapes (2015)

Andreas Gursky, Tour de France, 2007, 120 ⅞ × 86 ¼ × 2 ½ inches (307 × 218.9 × 6.2 cm)

Andreas Gursky, Tour de France, 2007, 120 ⅞ × 86 ¼ × 2 ½ inches (307 × 218.9 × 6.2 cm)

The textbook definition of “landscape” is a depiction of an expanse of scenery, generally seen from a single viewpoint, which, like fiction, not only displays, but also conveys a narrative of nature as filtered through one person’s perspective. In American art history, landscape painting holds an exalted position because it signifies a national identity animated by the combination of divine creative power and manifest destiny. From the monumentally scaled, highly theatrical Hudson River School paintings of Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900) and Albert Bierstadt (1830–1902) to the more intimate plein air expressions of William Merritt Chase (1849–1916) and William Glackens (1870–1938), artistic depictions of nature offer a continuous thread illuminating America’s collective imagination.

But “landscape” can also be understood as an action (enhancing the land to make it look better), as a way to define a situation (the economic landscape) or even as a psychological state of being (an emotional landscape defined by intellectual or imaginative characteristics). Both of these definitions coexist in Andreas Gursky’s photographs, a selection of which will be on view in Andreas Gursky: Landscapes, opening August 2 at the Parrish Art Museum in Water Mill, New York. His monumentally scaled photographs capture in extreme detail vast natural landscapes, grand architectural edifices, broad open expanses of water, and masses of people engaged in daily life. For Landscapes he has selected a body of work as a studied response to his understanding of what he calls “the specific situation” of the Parrish: its location on the East End of Long Island and the historical tradition of artistic creativity for which the region is renowned. “For me,” Gursky noted, “it doesn’t matter if I deal with landscape, still life, interior, or architecture. For me it is just so much about my view on the world.”

Andreas Gursky Parrish Art Museum

Andreas Gursky, Klausenpass (Klausen Pass), 1984, 24 ⅞ × 30 ⅝ × 1 ⅝ inches (63.2 × 77.8 × 4 cm)

Gursky makes photographs with a seemingly dispassionate viewpoint of an omniscient observer. He has spent much of his career photographing landscapes, recording them directly with a large-format camera in Klausen Pass (1984) or composing them digitally from a series of shots, as in Rhine II (1999). His images are titled simply and directly after the geographical place where they were taken. Early landscapes such as Engadin I (1995) or Tour de France (2007) specify location as a vast majesty of natural terrain within which humans only register on a minute scale. In Salerno I (1990) or Bahrain I (2005), however, man-made forms loom in the foreground, showing how humans stake a more emphatic claim on their environment by dramatically altering the terrain. Writing in Andreas Gursky: Works 80–08, curator Martin Hentschel posits the artist’s work as a “mental image … that has been passed down to us by the history of painting and inscribed into our collective memory.” No matter what their subject though, Gursky’s pictures reflect his idiosyncratic perspective on both topography and compositional structure. His landscapes are not only markers of a particular time and place, they are also something otherworldly: an image that surpasses the basic conditions of its creation.

Gursky’s signature accomplishment as an artist is his ability to estrange his image from normal perception. Ocean III (2010) asks viewers to assume the nearly impossible position of comprehending the macrocosmic, while Untitled III (2002) immerses them in a microcosmic viewpoint. These distinctions can also be expressed in contrasting terms of image density, as in Untitled XII (2002), or expansiveness, demonstrated in James Bond Island III (2007). In his work, polarities are often juxtaposed or inhabit the same space. Immense landscapes, such as Rhine II (1999) and Greeley (2002), or architectural investigations, like Schipol (1994) or Kamiokande (2007), compare and contrast seemingly unrelated themes—monumentalizing motifs, tiny details, patterns, manifold repetition, and compression of perspective—that are united to underscore Gursky’s fascination with how both man-made and naturally occurring structures shape human consciousness.

Andreas Gursky Parrish Art Museum

Andreas Gursky, Greeley, 2002, 87 × 111 ⅞ × 2 ½ inches (221 × 284 × 6.2 cm)

Nowhere is the dissonance between the natural landscape and the incursion of humanity through commerce and popular culture more evident than in such works as SH I (2013) and SH II (2014). In this series, the artist has most emphatically staged a psychological “place” in which humans occupy the landscape within a highly suggestive narrative. Gursky hasn’t consciously set out to revisit the rhapsodic romanticism epitomized by Caspar David Freidrich (1774–1840), although he readily recognizes that viewers may leap to that association. “If one compares the recent superhero images to the German Romantic period, of course there is a similarity of composition. But in developing the concept, it’s not that I have Freidrich in mind or that I construct the composition to resemble those pictures,” he noted. “As an artist, I acknowledge that there are icons in our collective memories, and I do hold that history in mind in the background.” What the artists do share is a willingness to assess the schism between the ideal of the earth as a godly creation and the reality of the impact incurred by human activity.

Throughout his career Gursky has explored the many nuanced facets of human existence. Highly detailed, his photographs are simultaneously deadpan observational and transcendent, encompassing both naturally occurring and man-made environments. Whatever his practical approach, the artist uses landscape to capture a sense of place and a moment in time that expresses his understanding of landscape as a site where human and natural forces collide in an increasingly homogenous world.

© 2015 Andreas Gursky/Artist Rights Society (ARS), New York/VG-Bild-Kunst, Bonn. All works are c-prints or inkjet prints. All dimensions include the frame.

Andreas Gursky

In Conversation
Andreas Gursky

Andreas Gursky and Richie Hawtin discuss their collaboration with art historian Laura Käding.

Anselm Kiefer, Maginot, 1977–93.

Veil and Vault

An exhibition at the Broad in Los Angeles prompts James Lawrence to examine how artists give shape and meaning to the passage of time, and how the passage of time shapes our evolving accounts of art.

Unreal Americans

Unreal Americans

Benjamin Nugent reflects on questions of verisimilitude and American life in the group exhibition I Don’t Like Fiction, I Like History at Gagosian, Beverly Hills.

Andreas Gursky and Jeff Wall

In Conversation
Andreas Gursky and Jeff Wall

On the occasion of a major survey of Andreas Gursky’s work at the Hayward Gallery in London, Gursky and Jeff Wall discuss the state of photography and the evolution of the medium.

Gagosian Quarterly Summer 2018

Gagosian Quarterly Summer 2018

The Summer 2018 Gagosian Quarterly issue is now available, featuring El Ejido, one of Andreas Gursky’s latest artworks, on its cover.

A black-and-white photograph of a woman's face by Dora Maar.

Discovering Dora Maar

Brigitte Benkemoun’s book Je suis le carnet de Dora Maar takes a novel approach to the art of biography. For the Quarterly, Benkemoun recounts her discovery of a mysterious Hermès address book, the subsequent realization of its genius former owner, and her journey to learn more about the life, friends, and art of Dora Maar.

Cover of the Winter 2019 Gagosian Quarterly, featuring a selection from a black-and-white Christopher Wool photograph

Now available
Gagosian Quarterly Winter 2019

The Winter 2019 issue of Gagosian Quarterly is now available, featuring a selection from Christopher Wool’s Westtexaspsychosculpture series on its cover.

Edmund de Waal and Jan Dalley, FT Weekend Festival, London, September 7, 2019

In Conversation
Edmund de Waal and Jan Dalley

At the FT Weekend Festival 2019 in London, Edmund de Waal sat down for a conversation with Financial Times arts editor Jan Dalley. They spoke about the relationship between words and sculpture in his practice, and about two recent projects: the two-part exhibition psalm, in Venice, and Elective Affinities, at the Frick Collection, New York.

Rachel Feinstein in her West 15th Street studio, New York, 2002.

Rachel Feinstein

The artist discusses her life and work with Alan Yentob.

Huma Bhabha during the installation of Huma Bhabha: The Company at Gagosian, Rome, September 2019.

Work in Progress
Huma Bhabha

The artist tells Negar Azimi about her interest in the monstrous, the influence of science fiction on her practice, and her recent rooftop commission at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.

John Currin, The Shaving Man, 1993.

Mansplaining: Figuring Masculinity in the Age of #MeToo

In light of recent developments around the definition of masculinity in American culture, Alison M. Gingeras, the curator of John Currin: My Life as a Man at Dallas Contemporary looks closely at the artist’s depictions of male subjects.

Artist Nam June Paik writing on his typewriter in black and white photo.

Reading Nam June Paik

Earlier this year, MIT Press released We Are in Open Circuits: Writings by Nam June Paik. Here Gregory Zinman, coeditor of the book along with John Hanhardt and Edith Decker-Phillips, writes about his first exposure to the artist’s archives, the discoveries made there, and the relationship between Paik’s writings and his larger practice.