Menu

Gagosian Quarterly

March 14, 2019

Piero Golia:Intermission Paintings

Andrew Berardini reflects on Piero Golia’s Intermission Paintings, relics from the first phase of the artist’s three-part sculptural performance The Comedy of Craft.

Installation view, Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings, Gagosian, Rome, June 9–September 10, 2015. Photo: Matthew D'Eletto

Installation view, Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings, Gagosian, Rome, June 9–September 10, 2015. Photo: Matthew D'Eletto

Conceptual artists are mystics rather than rationalists. They leap to conclusions that logic cannot reach.
—Sol LeWitt, “Sentences on Conceptual Art,” Art-Language, 1969

Faith requires doubt: the healthy doubt you feel about any new artist. Alighiero e Boetti declared the artist as in between a shaman and a showman. With the levity of astonished delight and the gravity of spiritual action, the artist bridges the gap through the metamorphosis of material into meaning. As a shaman channels mystical powers, all results are infused with their magic: simple objects transform into relics.

On evidence here are a few relics cut during The Comedy of Craft, an epic trilogy by artist Piero Golia.

A relic is what remains.

Relics exist all over and throughout time. In Europe, it was the Middle Ages rage. A few tenuous bits of Bible back up the possibility of miraculous objects.

God did extraordinary miracles through Paul, so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them.
—Acts 19:11–12, New International Version

The Second Council of Nicaea in 787 decreed that every altar should contain a relic. The Orthodox Christians believe that the body of a believer has been transformed by divine grace after being inducted to the sacred mysteries. To them, all bodies of the faithful are relics.

The Roman Catholic Church has divined hierarchies for relics, as even in heaven there’s first class and coach. A first-class relic belonged to either Jesus himself (like straws from his Bethlehem manger), his mother (thousands of gallons of her breast milk graced the marketplace), or the body of a saint, hacked off in parts or whole. “Grace remains entire in every part,” according to fifth-century theologian Theodoret. Second-class relics are objects of the saints; hierarchies apply here as well, depending on how useful or holy-seeming the relic is to the life of the saint. Third-class relics are anything that’s touched the first two. Though now illegal according to Catholic canon, the sale of relics was a Middle Ages blockbuster bonanza. Holy body trafficking and spiritual pilgrimage became a serious shaper of tourism, international exchange, and culture. In search of revelation, we will gather all clues and parts as valuable.

Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings

Installation view, The Comedy of Craft (Act 1: Carving the nose), Hammer Museum, Los Angeles, June 15–September 7, 2014. Photo: courtesy the artist

The Protestant Reformation broke the back of the religious relic trade. Though still around to be sure, it sunk after Martin Luther and, especially, John Calvin condemned the practice. The market still limps along (the body parts of saints are readily found on eBay), but then again so do the religions that venerate them.

Correlation is not causality, but the ascendancy of art tracks more or less with the diminishment of relics. One certainly did not cause the other, but they relate.

Meaning didn’t need to be so literal after the Renaissance: Craft, skill, vision, interpretation, and innovation could be honored and gain importance and even holiness without religion. But perhaps something is lost in these abstract ideals. I’m not surprised that one of the great debates around art of the last century and a half or so relates to the human hand: whether it matters, when and if it should be seen. Somehow being handled (or at least explicitly authored) by the artist still matters. Marketeers’ and the connoisseur experts’ imprimatur of veracity for an art object tracks nicely with the same search for authenticity in the relic trade.

Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings

Installation view, The Comedy of Craft (Act 2: Copying the nose of George Washington), Prospect.3, New Orleans, October 25, 2014–January 25, 2015. Photo: courtesy the artist

Some artists do everything to avoid this, but they only serve to transfer their right to grant authenticity to intermediaries. Conceptualism largely rejected materiality for what Lucy Lippard called “the dematerialization of the art object.” They traded skill and form for ideas, systems, and stories, in many cases dispensing with objects altogether. But things still matter though, because people (and their bodies) still matter. We stand diminished by the influence of bureaucracies and brands; we need others, their touch—relationships that are ours and real and not so mediated that they’re lost in a distant factory.

If every action matters and grace remains in every part, the remnants become relics, each mark and part a gesture enshrined in an object.

In Los Angeles (where the artist lives and works), at the Hammer Museum, Piero Golia carved from foam a one-to-one replica of George Washington’s nose from the face of Mount Rushmore in the Black Hills of South Dakota, a colossal unfinished 60-foot-tall sculpture by Gutzon Borglum and son of four popular American presidents’ busts made between 1925 and 1941. The nose takes up 21 feet.

Writing about Golia typically requires a preamble, as the legend of the piece and its creator becomes almost as important as the piece itself.

Andrew Berardini

Like the original Dakota artist, Golia hand carved his Washington’s nose, the performance of which played out on the Hammer’s terrace over the course of its biennial. This carving makes the first of the three acts in the artist’s opera, The Comedy of Craft. The action of copying becomes the subject of the work, the building of narrative for the artwork. The full process of making a sculpture becomes a story accessible to the viewer as it’s done live, as a performance. Each piece, each remnant, is a part of its revelation.

The second act, played out during the Prospect.3 biennial in New Orleans, involved the making of a mold from the carving, while the third act involves the pouring of bronze to solidify the series in a final sublime action. All three acts were and will be done in public as a performance. The subtle and unsubtle importance of handcraft as well as political stagecraft are deftly alluded to, but their exact import are allusively elusive. The institutions the artist moves through become stages to be overcome: a theater is just a building, and a museum an expensive warehouse, if its dull thingness is not overthrown by the spell cast from the artists who move across them.

Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings

Installation view, Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings, Gagosian, Rome, June 9–September 10, 2015. Photo: Matthew D’Eletto

Here we have an intermission between acts two and three. It comes as no surprise to me that it occurs in Rome, the Eternal City, home to more relics than any other city in the world.

The monochrome paintings on view are relics remaining from the carving of Washington’s nose. Preserved under a protective coating of hard polymer, the foam relics will always bear the mark of the process of their creation, the process of material being transformed into meaning. These objects surge with incidental beauty, some soft comment on modernist purity, a wash of pure color like a Minimalist master, the prison of marble that Renaissance sculptures had to escape to come into their polished finality. Here they are made not with composition but the rigorous, methodological following of a premise made with a leap, made by the artist and us, together.

Piero Golia: Intermission Paintings, Gagosian, Rome, June 9–September 10, 2015; text excerpted from “The Genealogy of Paintings” by Andrew Berardini © 2015 Andrew Berardini, from Twelve Intermission Paintings; artwork © Piero Golia

Piero Golia.

Myth-Maker

Alexander Wolf explores the economic, social, and methodological concerns of Piero Golia’s art practice, revealing the real-world implications of the artist’s experiments with form and process.

The cover of the Fall 2019 Gagosian Quarterly magazine. Artwork by Nathaniel Mary Quinn

Now available
Gagosian Quarterly Fall 2019

The Fall 2019 issue of Gagosian Quarterly is now available, featuring a detail from Sinking (2019) by Nathaniel Mary Quinn on its cover.

Rachel Feinstein in her West 15th Street studio, New York, 2002.

Rachel Feinstein

The artist discusses her life and work with Alan Yentob.

John Currin, The Shaving Man, 1993.

Mansplaining: Figuring Masculinity in the Age of #MeToo

In light of recent developments around the definition of masculinity in American culture, Alison M. Gingeras, the curator of John Currin: My Life as a Man at Dallas Contemporary looks closely at the artist’s depictions of male subjects.

Artist Nam June Paik writing on his typewriter in black and white photo.

Reading Nam June Paik

Earlier this year, MIT Press released We Are in Open Circuits: Writings by Nam June Paik. Here Gregory Zinman, coeditor of the book along with John Hanhardt and Edith Decker-Phillips, writes about his first exposure to the artist’s archives, the discoveries made there, and the relationship between Paik’s writings and his larger practice.

Before the Smoke Has Cleared

Before the Smoke Has Cleared

Angela Brown provides a glimpse into the charged ecologies of recent drawings and sculptures by Tatiana Trouvé. These works will be included in On the Eve of Never Leaving, Trouvé’s first solo exhibition in Los Angeles, opening in November 2019.

Richard Serra, Hands Scraping, 1968, film still.

The Art of Perception: Richard Serra’s Films

For eleven years, from 1968 to 1979, Richard Serra created a collection of films and videos that felt out the uncharted phenomenological boundaries of the medium. Carlos Valladares explores a selection of these works.

A painting with gold frame by Louis Michel Eilshemius. Landscape with single figure.

Eilshemius and Me: An Interview with Ed Ruscha

Ed Ruscha tells Viet-Nu Nguyen and Leta Grzan how he first encountered Louis Michel Eilshemius’s paintings, which of the artist’s aesthetic innovations captured his imagination, and how his own work relates to and differs from that “Neglected Marvel,” Eilshemius.

Helen Frankenthaler, Riverhead, 1963 (detail).

Frankenthaler

On the occasion of the exhibition Pittura/Panorama: Paintings by Helen Frankenthaler, 1952–1992, at the Museo di Palazzo Grimani in Venice, Italy, art historians John Elderfield and Pepe Karmel discuss the concept of the panorama in relation to the artist’s work. Their conversation traces developments in Frankenthaler’s approach to composition, the boundaries and conventions of abstraction, and how, in many ways, her career continually challenged established theories of art history.

Sarah Sze, Dews Drew (Half-life), 2018.

Sarah Sze: Infinite Generation

Louise Neri talks with Sarah Sze about the new primacy of the image in her explorations between and across mediums. They spoke on the occasion of an exhibition of Sze’s work at Gagosian, Rome, comprising collaged panel paintings, a large-scale video installation, and an outdoor sculpture fashioned from a natural boulder.

Nathaniel Mary Quinn, Brooklyn, New York, 2019.

Nathaniel Mary Quinn

Anderson Cooper spoke with the artist at his Brooklyn studio about his childhood and the visionary nature of his art.

Left: Sally Mann, Self-Portrait, 1974; right: Jenny Saville in her studio, c. 1990s.

Sally Mann and Jenny Saville

The two artists discuss being drawn to difficult subjects, the effects of motherhood on their practice, embracing chance, and their shared adoration of Cy Twombly.